Head-to-head comparison

Stratasys vs. the Machines on Your Shortlist

Comparing a BigRep, 3D Systems, Carbon, or EOS system? Here are the published specifications side by side across five additive technologies, and the reasons engineering teams choose Stratasys anyway.

  • ✓ Head-to-head specifications for all five technologies
  • ✓ A benchmark part printed on the Stratasys machine you are comparing
  • ✓ Installed pricing and lead time, not a brochure
Stratasys

Get pricing and a benchmark part

Tell us the system you are evaluating and the part you need to make.

Stratasys

Tell us which machine you are comparing and we will send the head-to-head, a benchmark part, and installed pricing.

Get Pricing

5

Additive technologies

27

Stratasys printers

39

Competing systems compared

Start with the technology, then the machine

Most comparisons go wrong because two printers that look alike on a spec sheet are built for different jobs. Pick the process that matches the part you need, then read the head-to-head. Every number below is a published manufacturer specification, and every Stratasys claim is tied to something you can verify on the machine.

Stratasys F870 large format FDM 3D printer

FDM

F870

Metre-long thermoplastic parts with soluble support, printed in a 95 °C chamber that holds temperature end to end.

Compare against BigRep →

Stratasys J850 Pro PolyJet 3D printer

PolyJet

J850 Pro

Rigid, flexible, and clear photopolymers combined in a single build, down to 14 microns.

Compare against 3D Systems →

Stratasys Neo series stereolithography 3D printer

Stereolithography

Neo800+

Large, smooth, dimensionally stable SLA parts on an open 355 nm resin platform you are not locked into.

Compare against 3D Systems →

Stratasys Origin Two P3 resin 3D printer

P3

Origin Two

Production photopolymer parts at 38.5 micron pixel resolution, bought outright instead of subscribed to.

Compare against Carbon →

Stratasys H350 SAF powder bed 3D printer

SAF

H350

Short-run production nylon and polypropylene parts with consistent quality from the first part to the last.

Compare against EOS →

FDM: large-format production parts in engineering thermoplastics

FDM is where most competitive shortlists start, and at large format the two machines look alike on the envelope — both are a metre long in X. What separates them is what happens inside the chamber while a part that size is printing.

Stratasys F870 large format FDM 3D printer
Stratasys

Stratasys F870

FDM · large format production

  • Build size
    39.4 × 24.0 × 24.0 in (1000 × 610 × 610 mm)
  • Layer thickness
    0.178 / 0.254 / 0.330 mm
  • Key capability
    95 °C fully heated chamber; N14, N20H, N25 heads
  • Materials
    Nylon 12CF, ASA (6 colors), ABS-M30, ABS Draft

Comparable system

BigRep STUDIO G2

FFF · open filament

  • Build size
    39.4 × 19.7 × 19.7 in (1000 × 500 × 500 mm)
  • Layer thickness
    0.1 – 0.6 mm
  • Key capability
    Build volume temperature 40 °C max; dual extruder
  • Materials
    ASA, ABS, HI-TEMP CF, PA6/66, PETG, PLA, TPU

Why buy the F870

Choose the F870 for 49% more build volume — 372 litres against 250 — and a 95 °C fully heated chamber against the STUDIO G2's 40 °C maximum. Both machines are a metre long in X. Only one holds temperature while a part that size is printing, which is what keeps the bottom of a tall part the same size as the top.

PolyJet: multi-material prototypes that behave like the product

This comparison is not decided on resolution or tray size. Both machines jet photopolymer at roughly the same layer height, and the ProJet holds the larger tray. What differs is the material library you can combine in a single build.

Stratasys J850 Pro PolyJet 3D printer
Stratasys

Stratasys J850 Pro

PolyJet · design and engineering

  • Build size
    19.3 × 15.4 × 7.9 in (490 × 390 × 200 mm)
  • Layer thickness
    Down to 14 microns
  • Key capability
    Multi-material; full color not included
  • Materials
    Vero, Agilus30, DraftGrey, VeroUltra

Comparable system

3D Systems ProJet MJP 5600

MultiJet · rigid and elastomer blends

  • Build size
    20.4 × 15.0 × 11.8 in (518 × 381 × 300 mm)
  • Layer thickness
    13 microns
  • Key capability
    Multi-material rigid and elastomer blends
  • Materials
    VisiJet M3 rigid and elastomeric

Why buy the J850 Pro

Choose the J850 Pro for the PolyJet material library — VeroUltra, Agilus30, Vero, and DraftGrey — when rigid-to-flexible, application-specific prototypes are what you are making. The ProJet holds the larger tray; the J850 Pro gives you more to combine on it. If full PANTONE-validated color is a requirement, ask us about the J850 Prime instead.

Stereolithography: large, smooth, dimensionally stable parts

At this size, two things decide the purchase: how much part fits in the vat, and whether you are free to choose your own resin. The Neo platform answers both the same way.

Stratasys Neo series stereolithography 3D printer
Stratasys

Stratasys Neo800+

SLA · large format

  • Build size
    31.5 × 31.5 × 23.6 in (800 × 800 × 600 mm)
  • Layer thickness
    50 – 200 microns
  • Key capability
    4 W 355 nm laser; scan speed to 20 m/s
  • Materials
    Open 355 nm SLA resins

Comparable system

3D Systems SLA 750 Dual

SLA · dual laser

  • Build size
    29.5 × 29.5 × 21.7 in (750 × 750 × 550 mm)
  • Layer thickness
    50 – 150 microns
  • Key capability
    Dual laser; RFID-required refill; no resin viscosity logging
  • Materials
    Accura SLA resins

Why buy the Neo800+

Choose the Neo800+ for 24% more build volume, an open 355 nm resin platform instead of locked cartridges, and resin viscosity logging that tells you what the vat is actually doing. Ask us for the installed system comparison on cost.

P3: production photopolymer parts you own outright

Programmable photopolymerization competes directly with Carbon's DLS systems. The resolution and thermal control are the technical argument. How the machine lands on your balance sheet is the other one.

Stratasys Origin Two P3 resin 3D printer
Stratasys

Stratasys Origin Two

P3 DLP · production

  • Build size
    7.6 × 4.3 × 14.6 in (192 × 108 × 370 mm)
  • Layer thickness
    25 – 200 microns
  • Key capability
    5K projector, 38.5 micron pixel; 60 °C heated chamber
  • Materials
    Validated P3 resins plus OpenAM

Comparable system

Carbon M3 Max

DLS · subscription

  • Build size
    12.1 × 6.4 × 12.8 in (307 × 163 × 326 mm)
  • Layer thickness
    Material dependent; 75 micron XY pixel
  • Key capability
    4K light engine; subscription model
  • Materials
    Carbon EPU, RPU, dental resins

Why buy Origin Two

Choose Origin Two for its 5K projector, finer 38.5 micron pixel size, 60 °C heated chamber, and validated plus OpenAM resin options. It is also a capital purchase rather than a subscription, so the asset stays yours.

SAF: short-run production nylon and polypropylene

Selective Absorption Fusion is built for repeatable production runs rather than one-off prototypes, with a focused material set and predictable build times.

Stratasys H350 SAF powder bed 3D printer
Stratasys

Stratasys H350

SAF · powder bed production

  • Build size
    12.4 × 8.2 × 11.5 in (315 × 208 × 293 mm)
  • Layer thickness
    Approximately 100 microns
  • Key capability
    Selective Absorption Fusion; integrated powder handling
  • Materials
    PA11, PA12, PP

Comparable system

EOS P 396

SLS · powder bed production

  • Build size
    13.4 × 13.4 × 23.6 in (340 × 340 × 600 mm)
  • Layer thickness
    60 to 180 microns
  • Key capability
    70 W CO₂ laser sintering
  • Materials
    PA11, PA12, glass-filled PA, TPU, Alumide

Why buy the H350

Choose the H350 for the SAF process and a focused production material set spanning PA11, PA12, and polypropylene. The EOS P 396 builds in a taller chamber; the H350 answers with a predictable 12-hour full build, integrated powder handling, and consistent part quality from the first part to the last.

Specifications are published manufacturer figures compiled October 2026 and are shown for comparison only. Confirm current specifications with the manufacturer before purchase.

Comparing a different machine?

The head-to-heads above cover the printers most buyers shortlist. The full Stratasys lineup and the systems each one is usually measured against are below. If the machine you are evaluating is on this list, we have the detailed comparison for it.

Stratasys printer Technology Commonly compared against
Stratasys F370FDMRaise3D Pro3 Plus, Zortrax M300
Stratasys F170FDMRaise3D Pro3
Stratasys F190 CRFDMRaise3D Pro3 HS, Bambu Lab H2D
Stratasys F370 CRFDMRaise3D Pro3 HS
Stratasys Fortus 450mcFDMHP Industrial Filament 600 HT, Roboze ARGO 350, Roboze ARGO 500, Essentium HSE 180 S HT, AON3D M2-2020
Stratasys F770FDMBigRep STUDIO G2, BigRep PRO, Modix BIG-120X V4, InnovatiQ X1000
Stratasys F870FDMBigRep STUDIO G2
Stratasys F3300FDMBigRep PRO
Stratasys F900FDMBigRep PRO, Roboze ARGO 1000, Cosine AM1 Filament, Cosine AM1 Pellet
Stratasys J850 PrimePolyJetMimaki 3DUJ-553, 3D Systems ProJet MJP 5600, HP Jet Fusion 580 Color, Sailner J501 and J501Pro
Stratasys J850 ProPolyJet3D Systems ProJet MJP 5600
Stratasys J850 CorePolyJet3D Systems ProJet MJP 5600
Stratasys J826 PrimePolyJet3D Systems ProJet MJP 5600
Stratasys J850 Digital AnatomyPolyJet3D Systems ProJet MJP 5600, Mimaki 3DUJ-553
Stratasys J850 TechStylePolyJetMimaki 3DUJ-553, 3D Systems ProJet MJP 5600
Stratasys J55 PrimePolyJetMimaki 3DUJ-2207, 3D Systems ProJet MJP 2500 Plus
Stratasys J35 ProPolyJet3D Systems ProJet MJP 2500 Plus, Mimaki 3DUJ-2207, Keyence Agilista 3100
Stratasys J5 Digital AnatomyPolyJet3D Systems ProJet MJP 2500 Plus, Mimaki 3DUJ-2207
Stratasys J5 MediJetPolyJet3D Systems Figure 4 Standalone, Mimaki 3DUJ-2207
Stratasys J5 DentaJetPolyJetCarbon M3, Carbon M2, 3D Systems NextDent 5100
Stratasys J3 DentaJetPolyJetCarbon M3, 3D Systems NextDent 5100
Stratasys DentaJet XLPolyJetCarbon M3 Max, 3D Systems NextDent 5100
Stratasys Neo800+Stereolithography3D Systems SLA 750 Dual, UnionTech RSPro 800 X
Stratasys Neo800Stereolithography3D Systems SLA 750, UnionTech RSPro 800 2.0
Stratasys Neo450sStereolithography3D Systems PSLA 270, UnionTech RSPro 450, Raplas RP450
Stratasys Origin TwoP3Carbon M3 Max, 3D Systems Figure 4 Standalone, Photocentric LC Magna
Stratasys H350SAFEOS P 396, EOS FORMIGA P 110 Velocis

Comparable systems are listed because buyers evaluate them alongside the Stratasys machine, not because the two are equivalent. Specifications are published manufacturer figures compiled October 2026.

What happens when you ask

Here is what the request covers and what comes back.

01.

Tell us the part

Geometry, material, tolerance, volume, and which machine you are comparing against.

02.

We print a benchmark

We run your geometry on the Stratasys machine so you are comparing parts, not datasheets.

03.

You get real numbers

Configuration, material, installed cost, and lead time, with the comparison written down.

Get the comparison for the machine on your shortlist

Send us the system you are evaluating and the part you need to make. We will come back with the Stratasys configuration that matches it, what it costs installed, and where the two genuinely differ.