Additive technologies
Stratasys printers
Competing systems compared
Most comparisons go wrong because two printers that look alike on a spec sheet are built for different jobs. Pick the process that matches the part you need, then read the head-to-head. Every number below is a published manufacturer specification, and every Stratasys claim is tied to something you can verify on the machine.
FDM
Metre-long thermoplastic parts with soluble support, printed in a 95 °C chamber that holds temperature end to end.
PolyJet
Rigid, flexible, and clear photopolymers combined in a single build, down to 14 microns.
Stereolithography
Large, smooth, dimensionally stable SLA parts on an open 355 nm resin platform you are not locked into.
P3
Production photopolymer parts at 38.5 micron pixel resolution, bought outright instead of subscribed to.
SAF
Short-run production nylon and polypropylene parts with consistent quality from the first part to the last.
FDM is where most competitive shortlists start, and at large format the two machines look alike on the envelope — both are a metre long in X. What separates them is what happens inside the chamber while a part that size is printing.
FDM · large format production
Comparable system
FFF · open filament
Choose the F870 for 49% more build volume — 372 litres against 250 — and a 95 °C fully heated chamber against the STUDIO G2's 40 °C maximum. Both machines are a metre long in X. Only one holds temperature while a part that size is printing, which is what keeps the bottom of a tall part the same size as the top.
This comparison is not decided on resolution or tray size. Both machines jet photopolymer at roughly the same layer height, and the ProJet holds the larger tray. What differs is the material library you can combine in a single build.
PolyJet · design and engineering
Comparable system
MultiJet · rigid and elastomer blends
Choose the J850 Pro for the PolyJet material library — VeroUltra, Agilus30, Vero, and DraftGrey — when rigid-to-flexible, application-specific prototypes are what you are making. The ProJet holds the larger tray; the J850 Pro gives you more to combine on it. If full PANTONE-validated color is a requirement, ask us about the J850 Prime instead.
At this size, two things decide the purchase: how much part fits in the vat, and whether you are free to choose your own resin. The Neo platform answers both the same way.
SLA · large format
Comparable system
SLA · dual laser
Choose the Neo800+ for 24% more build volume, an open 355 nm resin platform instead of locked cartridges, and resin viscosity logging that tells you what the vat is actually doing. Ask us for the installed system comparison on cost.
Programmable photopolymerization competes directly with Carbon's DLS systems. The resolution and thermal control are the technical argument. How the machine lands on your balance sheet is the other one.
P3 DLP · production
Comparable system
DLS · subscription
Choose Origin Two for its 5K projector, finer 38.5 micron pixel size, 60 °C heated chamber, and validated plus OpenAM resin options. It is also a capital purchase rather than a subscription, so the asset stays yours.
Selective Absorption Fusion is built for repeatable production runs rather than one-off prototypes, with a focused material set and predictable build times.
SAF · powder bed production
Comparable system
SLS · powder bed production
Choose the H350 for the SAF process and a focused production material set spanning PA11, PA12, and polypropylene. The EOS P 396 builds in a taller chamber; the H350 answers with a predictable 12-hour full build, integrated powder handling, and consistent part quality from the first part to the last.
Specifications are published manufacturer figures compiled October 2026 and are shown for comparison only. Confirm current specifications with the manufacturer before purchase.
The head-to-heads above cover the printers most buyers shortlist. The full Stratasys lineup and the systems each one is usually measured against are below. If the machine you are evaluating is on this list, we have the detailed comparison for it.
| Stratasys printer | Technology | Commonly compared against |
|---|---|---|
| Stratasys F370 | FDM | Raise3D Pro3 Plus, Zortrax M300 |
| Stratasys F170 | FDM | Raise3D Pro3 |
| Stratasys F190 CR | FDM | Raise3D Pro3 HS, Bambu Lab H2D |
| Stratasys F370 CR | FDM | Raise3D Pro3 HS |
| Stratasys Fortus 450mc | FDM | HP Industrial Filament 600 HT, Roboze ARGO 350, Roboze ARGO 500, Essentium HSE 180 S HT, AON3D M2-2020 |
| Stratasys F770 | FDM | BigRep STUDIO G2, BigRep PRO, Modix BIG-120X V4, InnovatiQ X1000 |
| Stratasys F870 | FDM | BigRep STUDIO G2 |
| Stratasys F3300 | FDM | BigRep PRO |
| Stratasys F900 | FDM | BigRep PRO, Roboze ARGO 1000, Cosine AM1 Filament, Cosine AM1 Pellet |
| Stratasys J850 Prime | PolyJet | Mimaki 3DUJ-553, 3D Systems ProJet MJP 5600, HP Jet Fusion 580 Color, Sailner J501 and J501Pro |
| Stratasys J850 Pro | PolyJet | 3D Systems ProJet MJP 5600 |
| Stratasys J850 Core | PolyJet | 3D Systems ProJet MJP 5600 |
| Stratasys J826 Prime | PolyJet | 3D Systems ProJet MJP 5600 |
| Stratasys J850 Digital Anatomy | PolyJet | 3D Systems ProJet MJP 5600, Mimaki 3DUJ-553 |
| Stratasys J850 TechStyle | PolyJet | Mimaki 3DUJ-553, 3D Systems ProJet MJP 5600 |
| Stratasys J55 Prime | PolyJet | Mimaki 3DUJ-2207, 3D Systems ProJet MJP 2500 Plus |
| Stratasys J35 Pro | PolyJet | 3D Systems ProJet MJP 2500 Plus, Mimaki 3DUJ-2207, Keyence Agilista 3100 |
| Stratasys J5 Digital Anatomy | PolyJet | 3D Systems ProJet MJP 2500 Plus, Mimaki 3DUJ-2207 |
| Stratasys J5 MediJet | PolyJet | 3D Systems Figure 4 Standalone, Mimaki 3DUJ-2207 |
| Stratasys J5 DentaJet | PolyJet | Carbon M3, Carbon M2, 3D Systems NextDent 5100 |
| Stratasys J3 DentaJet | PolyJet | Carbon M3, 3D Systems NextDent 5100 |
| Stratasys DentaJet XL | PolyJet | Carbon M3 Max, 3D Systems NextDent 5100 |
| Stratasys Neo800+ | Stereolithography | 3D Systems SLA 750 Dual, UnionTech RSPro 800 X |
| Stratasys Neo800 | Stereolithography | 3D Systems SLA 750, UnionTech RSPro 800 2.0 |
| Stratasys Neo450s | Stereolithography | 3D Systems PSLA 270, UnionTech RSPro 450, Raplas RP450 |
| Stratasys Origin Two | P3 | Carbon M3 Max, 3D Systems Figure 4 Standalone, Photocentric LC Magna |
| Stratasys H350 | SAF | EOS P 396, EOS FORMIGA P 110 Velocis |
Comparable systems are listed because buyers evaluate them alongside the Stratasys machine, not because the two are equivalent. Specifications are published manufacturer figures compiled October 2026.
Here is what the request covers and what comes back.
Geometry, material, tolerance, volume, and which machine you are comparing against.
We run your geometry on the Stratasys machine so you are comparing parts, not datasheets.
Configuration, material, installed cost, and lead time, with the comparison written down.
Send us the system you are evaluating and the part you need to make. We will come back with the Stratasys configuration that matches it, what it costs installed, and where the two genuinely differ.